Jan 28

Complete Premium video at: http://fora.tv/conference/wired_business_conference_2011

Bill Gates reflects on the future of nuclear power in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster in Japan. “Software simulation changes the game,” argues Gates, highlighting the advantage of being able to virtually test new designs before building them.

—–

Energy Innovation: A Tour of the Most Promising Technologies to Replace Oil and Coal

Bill Gates, Co-Chair & Trustee, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Chairman, Microsoft Corporation in conversation with Chris Anderson

Bill Gates III is chairman of Microsoft Corporation, the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential. In July 2008, Gates transitioned out of a day-to-day role in the company to spend more time on his global health and education work at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates continues to serve as Microsoft’s chairman and an advisor on key development projects.

Duration : 0:3:20

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 11

r3VOLt23 04.01.2012
Japan Experts: Unknown if radiation will decrease over time —
May rise again as highly contaminated debris comes from mountains :: Antinuclear town councillor found shot dead in car, Japan :: South Korea: Radioactive store-bought seaweed measures 0.81 microSv/hr — 20 microSv/hr on tissue used to wipe car hood (VIDEOS)

AP: Local Alaska officials concerned Fukushima radiation sickened seals — “There may be some surprises” says prof… But “gut feeling” not connected

Greenpeace files complaint against French nuclear group

’US government does not seek confrontation over the Strait of Hormuz, but…’

Reactor Operator: FOIA response shows US knew in March that Spent Fuel Pool No. 3 leaking — “Flooding of pool may not be possible due to damage” (VIDEO)

They Will Grow Rice Again This Year in Fukushima

Jumping Fences

Local Japan official found with shotgun blast to chest — Lectured against nuclear power after Fukushima

EDF Energy cuts Scottish nuclear output after storm

’Fantasy’ plans of doubling nuclear capacity would cut global carbon emissions by just 4 percent — Need one new plant each week for two decades

Leak, 2nd partial shutdown raise concerns about quake damage at North Anna nuke plant

New Year’s Update: Fukushima Timeline website now live — Feedback requested

Fukushima Whistleblower: Container vessel melting like honeycomb — “Can you believe it is out of the container vessel”? (PHOTOS)

IEEE: Fukushima gives credence to anti-nuclear argument — Clear that nuke power will decrease in coming decades — Will not positively contribute to reducing greenhouse gases

Nuclear numbers down despite connections

Spain selects site for waste storage

Reactor dome installed at Changjiang 1

Japan Times: Boiling antinuclear sentiment may lead to all of nation’s reactors being idled

Iran ‘recommends’ US stay out of Persian Gulf

Reports: Fukushima women losing their hair — Resemblance to chemotherapy? (PHOTOS)

NRC Staff Train Students in Africa

Nuclear watchdog urges French plants to boost safety

FORUM: Discussion Thread for Jan. 3 — Jan. 9, 2012

”It’s Leaning”: Japan nuclear engineer concerned about collapse of Reactor No. 4 — Oxidation must have weakened building material… MORE

2 nuclear safety panel members got 7.1 mil. yen donation from industry BEFORE assuming duties at the watchdog

TEPCO says water level in tank at Fukushima nuclear dropped due to quake

Iran nuclear crisis: France wants ’stricter’ sanctions

New Year despair for Japan’s nuclear refugees

Report from Fukushima (2) Minami Soma: A Woman Speaks Out on Her Health Problems in Post-Accident Fukushima

What happens the day after Iran gets the bomb?

Wrap-up of nuclear news 2011

Strange: Animals went mad and began attacking humans after exposure to high radiation levels, says Chernobyl scientist — Dogs, foxes, wolves, hogs (VIDEO)

Obama govt doing a balancing act with sanctions on Iran

In UK’s slow economy, renewable energy is coming up trumps

Britain’s nuclear veterans continue their fight against Ministry of Defence, for compensation

Despite public opposition, Spain’s aging nuclear plant may stay open

Reality Inside #Fukushima I Nuke Plant (2): 10% of Workers Are Yakuza-Sourced

Fukushima Reactor 4 Leaning
http://nukene.ws/story/%E2%80%9Cit%E2%80%99s-leaning%E2%80%9D-japan-nuclear-e…

Virginia North Anna Plant 2nd Partial Shutdown
http://nukene.ws/story/leak-2nd-partial-shutdown-raise-concerns-about-quake-d…

Spain Waste Site – Villar de Cañas 
http://nukene.ws/story/spain-selects-site-waste-storage/20120103

Changjiang Nuclear Reactor Dome Installed
http://nukene.ws/story/reactor-dome-installed-changjiang-1/20120103

Fukushima, Japan Hair Loss
http://nukene.ws/story/reports-fukushima-women-losing-their-hair-%E2%80%94-re…


Original upload:NukeNews 
NukeNe.ws Home Page: http://NukeNe.ws


Live Headlines: http://NukeNe.ws/headlines


THANKS FOR WATCHING Blessings Sayonara

Duration : 0:3:39

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 3

Excerpt from recently updated Operation Upshot-Knothole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M65_Atomic_Cannon

Picatinny Arsenal was tasked to create a nuclear capable artillery piece in 1949. Robert Schwartz, the engineer who created the preliminary designs, essentially scaled up the 240mm shell (then the maximum in the arsenal) and used the German K5 railroad gun as a point of departure for the carriage. (The name “Atomic Annie” likely derives from the nickname “Anzio Annie” given to a German K5 gun which was employed against the American landings in Italy.) The design was approved by the Pentagon, largely through the intervention of chief of the Ballistics Section of the Ordnance Department’s Research and Development Division, Samuel Feltman, and a three-year developmental effort was begun. The project proceeded quickly enough to produce a demonstration model to participate in Dwight Eisenhower’s inaugural parade in January of 1953.

The cannon was transported by two specially designed tractors, both capable of independent steering in the manner of some extra-long fire engines. Each of the tractors was rated at 375 hp, and the somewhat awkward combination could achieve speeds of 35 miles an hour and negotiate right turns on 28 ft wide, paved or packed roads. The artillery piece could be unlimbered in 15 minutes and then returned to traveling configuration in 15 minutes more.

On May 25, 1953 at 8:30am local time, the Atomic Cannon was tested at Nevada Test Site (specifically Frenchman Flat) as part of the Upshot-Knothole series of nuclear tests. The test–codenamed Grable–was attended by then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Arthur W. Radford and Secretary of Defense Charles E. Wilson; it resulted in the successful detonation of a 15 kt shell (warhead W9) at a range of 7 miles. This was the first and only nuclear shell to be fired from a cannon.

Subsequent to the successful test, there were at least 20 of the cannons manufactured at Watervliet and Watertown Arsenals, at a cost of $800,000. They were deployed overseas to Europe and Korea, often continuously shifted around to avoid being detected and targeted by opposing forces. Due to the size of the apparatus, their limited range, the development of nuclear shells compatible with existing artillery pieces (the W48 for the 155mm and the W33 for the 203mm), and the development of rocket and missile based nuclear artillery, the M65 was effectively obsolete soon after it was deployed. However, it remained a prestige weapon and was not retired until 1963.

Duration : 0:1:6

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 2

Castle Bravo was the code name given to the first U.S. test of a so-called dry fuel thermonuclear device, detonated on March 1, 1954 at Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands, by the United States, as the first test of Operation Castle (a longer series of tests of various devices). Unexpected fallout from the detonation—intended to be a secret test—poisoned the crew of Daigo Fukuryū Maru (“Lucky Dragon No. 5″), a Japanese fishing boat, and created international concern about atmospheric thermonuclear testing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_bravo

Duration : 0:4:9

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Nov 8

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
Idaho Operations Office

SL-1 The Accident: Phases I and II
A13886VNB1

Describes this nuclear accident from the point of view of the Atomic Energy Commission.

Considering the time, this film report is exceptionally candid about the vulnerabilities of nuclear reactors. This first civilian reactor accident was especially gruesome in that one of the reactor operators was shot into the ceiling by an expelled reactor vessel plug and control rod. Views of the internal wreckage are fascinating. The cause of this accident has never been determined, although operator error has been alleged.

Documentaries of this quality are rare in the U.S. nuclear community, at least for the general public.

Producer: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission; Creative Commons license: Public Domain

The SL-1, or Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One, was a United States Army experimental nuclear power reactor which underwent a steam explosion and meltdown in January 1961, killing its three operators. The direct cause was the improper withdrawal of the only movable control rod. The event is the only fatal reactor accident in the United States.

The facility, located at the National Reactor Testing Station approximately forty miles (60 km) west of Idaho Falls, Idaho, was part of the Army Nuclear Power Program and was known as the Argonne Low Power Reactor (ALPR) during its design and build phase. It was intended to provide electrical power and heat for small, remote military facilities, such as radar sites near the Arctic Circle, and those in the DEW Line. The design power was 3 MW (thermal). Operating power was 200 kW electrical and 400 kW thermal for space heating. NASA system failure studies have cited that the core power level reached nearly 20 GW in just four milliseconds, precipitating the reactor accident and steam explosion.

On December 21, 1960, the reactor was shut down for maintenance, calibration of the instruments, installation of auxiliary instruments, and installation of 44 flux wires to monitor the neutron flux levels in the reactor core. The wires were made of aluminum, and contained slugs of aluminum-cobalt alloy.

On January 3, 1961 the reactor was restarted after a shutdown of eleven days. Maintenance procedures commenced, which required the main central control rod to be withdrawn a few inches; at 9:01 p.m. this rod was withdrawn almost to the top of the core, causing SL-1 to go prompt critical. In four milliseconds, the heat generated by the resulting enormous power surge caused water surrounding the core to begin to explosively vaporize. The water vapor caused a pressure wave to strike the top of the reactor vessel. This propelled the control rod and the entire reactor vessel upwards, which killed the operator who had been standing on top of the vessel, leaving him pinned to the ceiling by a control rod. The other two military personnel, a supervisor and a trainee, were also killed. The victims were Army Specialists John A. Byrnes and Richard L. McKinley and Navy Electrician’s Mate Richard C. Legg.

Reactor principles and events
Fission produces neutrons with a wide range of energies. In all light-water-moderated reactors (LWR), to sustain fission of the U-235 the reactor core needs to have water present to moderate (slow down) the neutrons produced by the nuclear reaction. This process is called “thermalizing” and increases the probability of the neutrons causing fission. When reactivity is inserted in the reactor core, more neutrons are available and power rises. Several factors limit the increase in power.

The first limiting factor is that, given a proper initial spectrum of neutron energies, water has a negative reactivity coefficient. Having a negative reactivity coefficient means that, as the water heats up, the molecules are farther apart (water expands and eventually changes phase) and neutrons are less likely to hit hydrogen atoms, so fewer neutrons are thermalized by collisions with the hydrogen in the water and the probability of fission decreases. This removes reactivity from the core. The lower the temperature, the closer the molecules, the greater the number of neutrons thermalized and the greater the core reactivity. It is also possible to design a reactor core that has an entirely different neutron energy spectrum such that it has conditions for which water has a positive reactivity coefficient. A graphite-moderated, water-cooled reactor like the RBMK reactors at Chernobyl may have a positive reactivity coefficient for coolant (water) temperature.

Duration : 0:40:23

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oct 10

http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2011/08/alert-north-anna-nuclear-earthquake.html

IF I LIVED ON NORTH ANNA LAKE (or directly down wind) I WOULD LEAVE THE AREA.

Only “reasonable assurance that the Safety Related systems are fully functional.”

the nuclear power plant is “in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. ”

NRC Event reports indicate that the earthquake exceeded North Anna Nuclear Plant’s Design earthquake limits by over at least FIVE cycles per second. It is interesting to note that immediate aftermath of the earthquake North Anna Nuclear plant’s televised spokespeople where quick to assure the local residents that design limits where not exceeded; they apparently have not be so forth coming in admitting that the initial information was incorrect.

Information drawn from NRC event reports 47201 and 47181

Duration : 0:4:54

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Oct 3

The highly radioactive nuclear waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation on the Columbia River in southcentral Washington state could be cleaned up at least 35 years faster than originally estimated, due to an agreement reached between two federal agencies and the state of Washington. The waste is the legacy of 45 years of nuclear weapons production. It amounts to about 60 percent of all the high-level nuclear waste in the United States. Drawing on the ideas that emerged from a year-long partnership with its contractors and state and federal regulators, DOE developed a plan for cleanup that dramatically reduces risks to people and the environment. Creative Commons license: Public Domain.

Duration : 0:15:26

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,